Digital humanities is a term that gets used loosely and is
not quite defined, but with all that we can gather from it one thing is
certain. You don't need electronics to subscribe to digital humanities. One
thing digital humanities has allowed for is that hacking can now be considered
a discipline. A discipline in which the question can now be posed, is it possible for education be hacked to expose ways of non-technological digital teaching?
What seems to be holding back the full educational benefits
of teaching is the inability to comprehensibly identify with digital and
non-digital as two parts to a whole and not two completely separate ideas, which are
interchangeable and mixable. Educators should not be limiting themselves
by thinking technology is a mere tool or that digital education must involve a
computer. By doing this, the educator cuts off a wealth of resources which may
be of great use in the classroom. If digital learning is treated as a tool then
it is only as useful as the task placed in front of it, to paraphrase Paul Fyfe, if you have a hammer, your problems would look
like nails. This amazing form of education which has potential to be so much
more than we allow it to be has resulted in a more narrow view on education due
to the ease at which things may be accomplished.
The goal is to get involved in “naked teaching”, being
stripped of the technologies that may hinder the learning process. To teach
“naked” does not mean free of any form of technology, it merely means removing
the electronic part of the digital learning.
Methods of implementation of such teaching could be as
simple as a high lighter and a book. Involving two main reading types,
intensive and distant. Each of these allows or a different type of learning.
A form of attentiveness in key when doing reading for one to
pick up on the subtle and somewhat unannounced themes of a book. This is why
any form of learning exercise is crucial to better learning especially in this
digital age we find ourselves in.
In some instances it is important to allow for creative flow
from students and to realize that the lecturer or teacher is merely a
facilitator for the exchange of knowledge. Offering a hands on option to learners
who are able to all work through something together which each of them only encounters for the first time in the classroom can
allow for amazing results.
Digital humanists should ultimately be an individual capable
of multi-faceted teaching and learning. While the world moves forward
digitally, it would be to one’s own detriment as well of those being taught, to
attempt to teach without digital technology.
Naked teaching is a thing, a fully clothed thing, which should be implemented in more educational institutes.
I agree with you that you do not need electronics to be digital. But teaching naked allows teachers to proceed with knowledge distribution without using foreign objects like computers and projectors.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea whether I should post a comment on the blog or on twitter, but I really like your blog. It sums it up very well and gives a different view of the article compared to my view and how I interpreted it. Always good to know other people's insights.
ReplyDelete